Otey v. State

26 So. 2d 915, 32 Ala. App. 443, 1946 Ala. App. LEXIS 321
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 1946
Docket8 Div. 477.
StatusPublished

This text of 26 So. 2d 915 (Otey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otey v. State, 26 So. 2d 915, 32 Ala. App. 443, 1946 Ala. App. LEXIS 321 (Ala. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From a judgment of conviction for rape, the punishment fixed at twenty years imprisonment, this appeal was taken.

Upon- examination of the trans-script we ascertain that the trial below proceeded throughout regularly in every way. Also, that the evidence adduced tended conclusively to establish the guilt of the defendant as charged in the indictment. Further, during the trial no ruling of the court was invoked. No written charge requested, nor was there a motion for a new trial. Thus it affirmatively appears, no question is presented for the consideration of this court; except to order the affirmance of the judgment of conviction of the lower court from which this appeal was taken.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 So. 2d 915, 32 Ala. App. 443, 1946 Ala. App. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otey-v-state-alactapp-1946.