Otero v. Davis

83 A.D.3d 565, 920 N.Y.S.2d 669

This text of 83 A.D.3d 565 (Otero v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otero v. Davis, 83 A.D.3d 565, 920 N.Y.S.2d 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about November 10, 2010, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[566]*566Defendant failed to meet her burden to establish that New York is an inconvenient forum for this action (see Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 478-479 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]; Bank Hapoalim [Switzerland] Ltd. v Banca Intesa S.p.A., 26 AD3d 286, 287 [2006]). There is nothing in the record to suggest that the court did not properly consider the relevant factors (see Pahlavi at 479). Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Islamic Republic of Iran v. Pahlavi
467 N.E.2d 245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) Ltd. v. Banca Intesa S.P.A.
26 A.D.3d 286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 565, 920 N.Y.S.2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otero-v-davis-nyappdiv-2011.