Otenio Longorio v. State
This text of 48 S.W. 514 (Otenio Longorio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a motion for a writ of certiorari. At the Dallas term, 1898, the appeal herein was dismissed because of the want of a final judgment. 44 S.W. Rep., 1089. On April 6, 1898, and subsequent to the adjournment of said Dallas term, mandate was issued. On May 2d application for certiorari was filed at Austin. A motion for rehearing has not been filed, nor a request to recall mandate, and the case stands in the attitude of asking a certiorari to perfect a record that has no standing in this court. The proceeding had been dismissed and the mandate issued in accordance with the judgment of dismissal. If appellants desired a reconsideration of their case, the proper steps, in proper time, should have been taken to have the same reviewed. The office of a certiorari is to perfect a record. It does not serve the purpose of a motion for rehearing and recall of mandate in order to reinstate the case. As presented the motion for certiorari can not be entertained. It is therefore dismissed.
Dismissed. *Page 105
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.W. 514, 40 Tex. Crim. 104, 1898 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otenio-longorio-v-state-texcrimapp-1898.