Otec v. Burlington Northern Railroad
890 S.W.2d 387, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 4, 1995 WL 3456
Opinion
Plaintiff-driver and his wife sued railroad for personal injuries sustained in a collision with a train at a railroad crossing. A jury found driver 100% negligent. Plaintiffs appeal.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Otec v. Burlington Northern Railroad, 890 S.W.2d 387, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 4, 1995 WL 3456 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
890 S.W.2d 387 (Otec v. Burlington Northern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.