Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co.

927 So. 2d 1010, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5633, 2006 WL 1067293
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2562·Published

Opinion

On Motion For Rehearing and/Or Clarification

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petitioner’s motion for rehearing. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the authority of Progressive Express Insurance Co. v. Miami Dade Health & Rehab Services, 922 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), and Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Co., 919 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). However, as in these cases, we certify conflict with Gedeon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 805 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Rehearing granted; certiorari denied; conflict certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co., 927 So. 2d 1010, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5633, 2006 WL 1067293 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

927 So. 2d 1010 (Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gedeon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
805 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
BRASS & SINGER v. United Auto. Ins. Co.
919 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Progressive Exp. Ins. Co. v. Miami Dade Hrs
922 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)