Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co.
This text of 927 So. 2d 1010 (Otano v. Star Casualty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion For Rehearing and/Or Clarification
We grant the petitioner’s motion for rehearing. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the authority of Progressive Express Insurance Co. v. Miami Dade Health & Rehab Services, 922 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), and Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Automobile Insurance Co., 919 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). However, as in these cases, we certify conflict with Gedeon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 805 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
Rehearing granted; certiorari denied; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
927 So. 2d 1010, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5633, 2006 WL 1067293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otano-v-star-casualty-insurance-co-fladistctapp-2006.