Otalora v. Solimeo

276 A.D.2d 473, 713 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9818
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant, Luigi Solimeo, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated September 16, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for reargument, and upon reargument, granted the plaintiffs leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint substituting Palian, Inc., as the defendant in place of Luigi Solimeo.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The defendant is not aggrieved by the order appealed from, and therefore has no standing to appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Berrios v Rockefeller Group, 212 AD2d 495; Gomberg v Gorman, 117 AD2d 583). Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Otalora v. Solimeo, 276 A.D.2d 473, 713 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 473 (Otalora v. Solimeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LoCiciro v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
276 A.D.2d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)