Home/New York Court of Appeals/Oswego River Realty Corp. v. Sweet Bros. Paper Manufacturing Co.

Oswego River Realty Corp. v. Sweet Bros. Paper Manufacturing Co.

4 N.E.2d 420, 272 N.Y. 505, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 992
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified to eliminate any adjudication as between the plaintiffs of riparian ownership or water rights in the pool above the dam, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur; Lehman and Crouch, JJ., dissent from so much of the decision as holds that the water power of the Peck Mill opening is confined to the amount of water necessary to operate a two-saw mill.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oswego River Realty Corp. v. Sweet Bros. Paper Manufacturing Co., 4 N.E.2d 420, 272 N.Y. 505, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 992 (N.Y. 1936).

4 N.E.2d 420 (Oswego River Realty Corp. v. Sweet Bros. Paper Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northern New York Power Corp. v. State
183 Misc. 306 (New York State Court of Claims, 1937)
Oswego River Realty Corp. v. Sweet Bros. Paper Manufacturing Co.
8 N.E.2d 618 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)