Oswego Falls Corp. v. Intervale Farms, Inc.

262 A.D. 941, 29 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6542

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Since neither of the original motions for change of venue was made on the ground of convenience of witnesses, the order was proper. The first time that convenience of witnesses was urged as a basis for the motion was when the Intervale Farms, Inc., made an informal motion on that ground on the return of the order to show cause that was brought on in the Fifth [Judicial] District. Thereby the Intervale Farms, Inc., consented to have that motion considered and determined in the Fifth [Judicial] District. All concur. (The order denies motion of Intervale Farms, Inc., for change of venue for convenience of witnesses.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris, and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oswego Falls Corp. v. Intervale Farms, Inc., 262 A.D. 941, 29 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 941 (Oswego Falls Corp. v. Intervale Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.