Home/New York Court of Appeals/Oswego County Support Collection Unit ex rel. Little v. Richards

Oswego County Support Collection Unit ex rel. Little v. Richards

801 N.E.2d 418, 100 N.Y.2d 637, 769 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 3439
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 801 N.E.2d 418 (Oswego County Support Collection Unit ex rel. Little v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oswego County Support Collection Unit ex rel. Little v. Richards, 801 N.E.2d 418, 100 N.Y.2d 637, 769 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 3439 (N.Y. 2003).

Opinion

[638]*638Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see e.g. Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298). Motions for a stay, a preference and poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
801 N.E.2d 418, 100 N.Y.2d 637, 769 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 3439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oswego-county-support-collection-unit-ex-rel-little-v-richards-ny-2003.