Oswalt v. State

86 S.E. 659, 17 Ga. App. 289, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 351
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 21, 1915·No. 6618·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. There is no merit in any of the exceptions. The practical effect of the passage of the general prohibition law of 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 81) was to destroy the exception as to incorporated towns and villages originally found in the act penalizing offers to sell intoxicating liquors within three miles of certain churches and schools; and the exceptions originally embodied in the Penal Code of 1895; § 435, were therefore purposely and properly omitted in the present code. While testimony as to the nonuse of the franchise of an alleged municipal corporation may have been irrelevant and immaterial, it is not shown that this evidence was prejudicial to the accused. In this connection see City of Barnesville v. Means, 128 Ga. 203 (57 S. E. 422).

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oswalt v. State, 86 S.E. 659, 17 Ga. App. 289, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 659 (Oswalt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Barnesville v. Means
57 S.E. 422 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)