Oswalt ex rel. Hugg v. Hartford Fire Insurance
34 A. 735, 175 Pa. 427, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1267
This text of 34 A. 735 (Oswalt ex rel. Hugg v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oswalt ex rel. Hugg v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 34 A. 735, 175 Pa. 427, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1267 (Pa. 1896).
Opinion
An examination of the testimony in this case, with special reference to the several assignments of error, has failed to convince us that there is anything in either of the learned trial judge’s rulings that requires a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A. 735, 175 Pa. 427, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oswalt-ex-rel-hugg-v-hartford-fire-insurance-pa-1896.