Oswald v. State of New York

2 U.S. 415, 1 L. Ed. 438, 2 Dall. 415, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 247
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 1793
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 U.S. 415 (Oswald v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oswald v. State of New York, 2 U.S. 415, 1 L. Ed. 438, 2 Dall. 415, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 247 (1793).

Opinion

2 U.S. 415 (____)
2 Dall. 415

OSWALD, Administrator,
versus
the STATE of NEW-YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

PROCLAMATION was made in this cause, "that any person having authority to appear for the State of New-York is required to appear accordingly;" and no person appearing it was ordered, on motion of Coxe for the Plaintiff,

BY THE COURT: — Unless the State appears by the first day of next Term to the above suit, or shew cause to the contrary, judgment will be entered by default against the said state.[*]

NOTES

[*] See ant. p. 401 and also post. Chisholm, executor, versus Georgia. Cutting, administrator, versus South Carolina. Grayson versus Virginia

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. District Court of Salt Lake County
128 P.2d 471 (Utah Supreme Court, 1942)
State Ex Rel. Haskell v. Huston
97 P. 982 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Chaffraix v. Board of Liquidation
11 F. 638 (E.D. Louisiana, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 U.S. 415, 1 L. Ed. 438, 2 Dall. 415, 1793 U.S. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oswald-v-state-of-new-york-scotus-1793.