Oswald v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.

178 P. 621, 104 Kan. 281, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 245
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1919
DocketNo. 21,949
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 178 P. 621 (Oswald v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oswald v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co., 178 P. 621, 104 Kan. 281, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 245 (kan 1919).

Opinion

[282]*282The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff appealed from the award of commissioners appointed by the district court to condemn a certain ground for depot purposes, and recovered exactly the same amount awarded him by the commissioners. ■ The railroad company moved to retax the costs amounting to $125, and from an order overruling this motion, it appeals.

While the motion should have been granted, an appeal cannot be had on a mere matter of costs. (Civ. Code, § 566, Gen. Stat. 1915, §7470; Richmond v. Brummie, 52 Kan. 247; 34 Pac. 783; Hazelwood v. Mendenhall, 97 Kan. 635, 156 Pac. 696; Shannon v. Abrams, 98 Kan. 26, 157 Pac. 449.)

It is also our duty to decline the assumption of jurisdiction, although the point is not raised by the parties. (Skoin v. Limerick, 50 Kan. 645, 31 Pac. 1051.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waugh v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
143 P.2d 788 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1943)
McCleery v. McCleery Lumber Co.
33 P.2d 1112 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1934)
Bradley & Vrooman Co. v. Summer
205 P. 609 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 P. 621, 104 Kan. 281, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oswald-v-st-joseph-grand-island-railway-co-kan-1919.