Oswald v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.
This text of 178 P. 621 (Oswald v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[282]*282The opinion of the court was delivered by
The plaintiff appealed from the award of commissioners appointed by the district court to condemn a certain ground for depot purposes, and recovered exactly the same amount awarded him by the commissioners. ■ The railroad company moved to retax the costs amounting to $125, and from an order overruling this motion, it appeals.
While the motion should have been granted, an appeal cannot be had on a mere matter of costs. (Civ. Code, § 566, Gen. Stat. 1915, §7470; Richmond v. Brummie, 52 Kan. 247; 34 Pac. 783; Hazelwood v. Mendenhall, 97 Kan. 635, 156 Pac. 696; Shannon v. Abrams, 98 Kan. 26, 157 Pac. 449.)
It is also our duty to decline the assumption of jurisdiction, although the point is not raised by the parties. (Skoin v. Limerick, 50 Kan. 645, 31 Pac. 1051.)
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 P. 621, 104 Kan. 281, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oswald-v-st-joseph-grand-island-railway-co-kan-1919.