Osvaldo De La Vega, Oscar De La Vega, Felicitas De La Vega and Alicia De La Vega v. Ashley Imming F/K/A Ashley Corbus
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
See id. (allowing only dismissal of an appeal or affirmance of an appealed judgment or order where
relief is granted based on appellant’s motion); cf. id. 42.1(a)(2) (allowing rendition of judgment
effectuating the parties’ agreement where relief is granted based on agreement signed by the parties
and filed with the clerk). Accordingly, we deny this request. 1
Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). 2 Any other
pending motions are denied as moot.
LISA J. SOTO, Justice
March 2, 2026
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
1 Under the circumstances, the trial court is the proper forum in which to make such a request. See Burns v. Bishop, 48 S.W.3d 459, 467 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.) (“Funds on deposit in the registry of a trial court are always subject to the control and order of the trial court, and the court enjoys great latitude in dealing with them.”). 2 Appellants request that costs be taxed against the party incurring them. Because the motion does not reflect that Appellee agreed to this request, we must tax costs against Appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osvaldo De La Vega, Oscar De La Vega, Felicitas De La Vega and Alicia De La Vega v. Ashley Imming F/K/A Ashley Corbus (Osvaldo De La Vega, Oscar De La Vega, Felicitas De La Vega and Alicia De La Vega v. Ashley Imming F/K/A Ashley Corbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.