O'Sullivan v. Moller

259 A.D. 830, 19 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6886

Opinion

In an action by the plaintiff-wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she slipped on a stairway made wet by rain water, and by her husband for loss of services and expenses, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case unanimously affirmed, with costs. We agree with the learned trial court that plaintiffs failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendants, but there is an additional reason why the judgment must be affirmed. The action is against the defendants solely in their representative capacity. Such an action does not lie. (Kirchner v. Muller, 280 N. Y. 23, 28.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Sullivan v. Moller, 259 A.D. 830, 19 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 830 (O'Sullivan v. Moller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirchner v. Muller
19 N.E.2d 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)