O'Sullivan v. Felix

194 F. 88, 114 C.C.A. 166, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 1912
DocketNo. 2,255
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 194 F. 88 (O'Sullivan v. Felix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Sullivan v. Felix, 194 F. 88, 114 C.C.A. 166, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1140 (5th Cir. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that this is an action for damages, and not for a penalty. The statute of limitation of five years against suits for penalties or forfeitures (R. S. § 1047 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 727]) is therefore not applicable. We find no federal statute of limitations applicable to the case. It follows that the state [89]*89statute, which prescribes the action in one year, must be applied. Civil Code of Louisiana, arts. 3536, 3537. We are constrained, therefore, to hold that the trial court correctly ruled that the action is barred.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moffett v. Commerce Trust Co.
87 F. Supp. 438 (W.D. Missouri, 1940)
Mitchell v. Greenough
100 F.2d 184 (Ninth Circuit, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 F. 88, 114 C.C.A. 166, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osullivan-v-felix-ca5-1912.