Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ostrowska v. Stempinski

Ostrowska v. Stempinski

8 A.D.2d 591, 185 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9296
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 591 (Ostrowska v. Stempinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostrowska v. Stempinski, 8 A.D.2d 591, 185 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice is denied, without costs, with leave to renew on a proper affidavit by the plaintiff as to cause of action, sequel® of injuries and financial status. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Yalente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 591, 185 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostrowska-v-stempinski-nyappdiv-1959.