Ostrower v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

286 A.D.2d 720, 730 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8547
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for an alleged violation of General Business Law § 349, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated July 6, 2000, as dismissed the sixth cause of action asserted in the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs’ claim based on an alleged violation of General Business Law § 349 has yet to accrue, since the defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company has not demanded the payment of premiums after the date on which the premiums were allegedly to “vanish” (see, Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. Co., 96 NY2d 201). Goldstein, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrower v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 286 A.D.2d 720, 730 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 720 (Ostrower v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pirrelli v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
129 A.D.3d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)