Ostrow v. Raysec Corp.
231 A.D. 755
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1930·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Raysec Corporation for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed upon the law and the facts and motion granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that a new trial should be had in the interests of substantial justice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ostrow v. Raysec Corp., 231 A.D. 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
231 A.D. 755 (Ostrow v. Raysec Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.