Ostroth v. Warren Regency, GP, LLC
This text of 696 N.W.2d 708 (Ostroth v. Warren Regency, GP, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OSTROTH
v.
WARREN REGENCY, G.P., L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 126859, COA: 245934.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are directed to include among the issues briefed: (1) whether MCL 600.5839(1) precludes application of the statutes of limitation prescribed by MCL 600.5805 and, if not, (2) which statute of limitation, MCL 600.5805(6) or MCL 600.5805(10), is applicable to the claim asserted against defendant Edward Schulak, Hobbs & Black, Inc. in this case. The motions for leave to file brief amicus curiae on appeal are also considered, and they are GRANTED. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the question presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 N.W.2d 708, 472 Mich. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostroth-v-warren-regency-gp-llc-mich-2005.