Ostroski v. Mount Prospect Shoprite, Inc.

230 A.2d 400, 49 N.J. 369

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 29, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

49 N.J. 369 (1967) 230 A.2d 400

CHRISTINE OSTROSKI, AN INFANT, BY HER GUARDIAN, AD LITEM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
MOUNT PROSPECT SHOPRITE, INC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND MICHAEL J. CISERO, DEFENDANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 29, 1967.

Mr. Sherwin Drobner for the petitioner.

Mr. Raymond L. Cunneen, Mr. Hugh J. O'Gorman, Messrs. Gaffey & Webb and Mr. John L. McDermott for the respondents.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

49 N.J. 369 (1967) 230 A.2d 400

CHRISTINE OSTROSKI, AN INFANT, BY HER GUARDIAN, AD LITEM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
MOUNT PROSPECT SHOPRITE, INC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND MICHAEL J. CISERO, DEFENDANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 29, 1967.

Mr. Sherwin Drobner for the petitioner.

Mr. Raymond L. Cunneen, Mr. Hugh J. O'Gorman, Messrs. Gaffey & Webb and Mr. John L. McDermott for the respondents.

Denied.

Ostroski v. Mount Prospect Shoprite, Inc., 230 A.2d 400, 49 N.J. 369 (N.J. 1967).

Pincite

230 A.2d 400 (Ostroski v. Mount Prospect Shoprite, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Odar v. Chase Manhattan Bank

351 A.2d 389 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)