Ostromski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
250 A.D. 828, 296 N.Y.S. 459, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9180
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AH concur, except Edgcomb, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action upon two life insurance policies. The order denies motion for a new trial upon the minutes.) Present —- Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ostromski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 250 A.D. 828, 296 N.Y.S. 459, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
250 A.D. 828 (Ostromski v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.