Ostrom v. Sapolsky

49 Misc. 610, 96 N.Y.S. 1070
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion made by the plaintiff herein was, clearly, a motion to amend or modify the judgment and, as such, came within the provisions of section 254 of the Municipal Court Act; and, not having been made within five days, as therein prescribed, the court below had no jurisdiction to entertain it and could not grant the relief asked for. Buschbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. 85. The appeal herein, however, being from the judgment as well as the order, this court may, upon appeal, “ reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or final order appealed from” (§ 310, Mun. Ct. Act), and the judgment herein may be modified by inserting therein [611] the words: Defendant liable to arrest and imprisonment on execution.”

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Present: Scott, Bischoff and McLean, JJ.

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrom v. Sapolsky, 49 Misc. 610, 96 N.Y.S. 1070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

49 Misc. 610 (Ostrom v. Sapolsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abramson v. Brimberg
120 N.Y.S. 746 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Musica v. Amalfitano
56 Misc. 505 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Barron v. Feist
51 Misc. 589 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)