Ostrom v. Ferris

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ostrom v. Ferris

141 A. 920, 103 N.J. Eq. 22, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 632

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 551.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trbnchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 551.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trbnchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Ostrom v. Ferris, 141 A. 920, 103 N.J. Eq. 22, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 632 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

141 A. 920 (Ostrom v. Ferris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.