Ostriker v. Ostriker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ostriker v. Ostriker

120 A.D.2d 506, 501 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 506 (Ostriker v. Ostriker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ostriker v. Ostriker, 120 A.D.2d 506, 501 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), dated October 31, 1985, as, upon granting the plaintiff wife’s motion for pendente lite relief, directed him to pay pendente lite maintenance in the amount of $250 per week and arrears of maintenance in the sum of $2,500.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s pendente lite maintenance award was not an abuse of discretion (see, Schwartz v Schwartz, 59 AD2d 905). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), dated October 31, 1985, as, upon granting the plaintiff wife’s motion for pendente lite relief, directed him to pay pendente lite maintenance in the amount of $250 per week and arrears of maintenance in the sum of $2,500.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s pendente lite maintenance award was not an abuse of discretion (see, Schwartz v Schwartz, 59 AD2d 905). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 506, 501 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostriker-v-ostriker-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack