Ostreicher v. Ostreicher

666 N.E.2d 1055, 87 N.Y.2d 1052, 644 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1128
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 666 N.E.2d 1055 (Ostreicher v. Ostreicher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostreicher v. Ostreicher, 666 N.E.2d 1055, 87 N.Y.2d 1052, 644 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1128 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

Motion by Isaac and Blima Ostreicher for leave to appeal dismissed for lack of aggrievement. Motion by Shia and Miriam Ostreicher for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 N.E.2d 1055, 87 N.Y.2d 1052, 644 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostreicher-v-ostreicher-ny-1996.