Ostrander v. Preece

296 U.S. 543, 56 S. Ct. 151
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 21, 1935
DocketNo. 488
StatusPublished

This text of 296 U.S. 543 (Ostrander v. Preece) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostrander v. Preece, 296 U.S. 543, 56 S. Ct. 151 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The ap[544]*544peal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U. S. 525, 540, 541-542; Campbell v. California, 200 U. S. 87, 95; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283, 288; Mager v. Grima, 8 How. 490, 493; Frederickson v. Louisiana, 23 How. 445, 447; United States v. Perkins, 163 U. S. 625, 627; United States v. Fox, 94 U. S. 315, 320-321.

Mr. Robert Newbegin for appellants. No appearance for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexandrine Mager v. Felix Grima
49 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1850)
FREDERICKSON v. State of Louisiana
64 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 1860)
United States v. Fox
94 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1877)
United States v. Perkins
163 U.S. 625 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank
170 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Campbell v. California
200 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Maxwell v. Bugbee
250 U.S. 525 (Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 543, 56 S. Ct. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostrander-v-preece-scotus-1935.