Home/Supreme Court/Ostrander v. Preece

Ostrander v. Preece

296 U.S. 543, 56 S. Ct. 151
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1935·No. No. 488·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The ap[544]*544peal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Maxwell v. Bugbee, 250 U. S. 525, 540, 541-542; Campbell v. California, 200 U. S. 87, 95; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283, 288; Mager v. Grima, 8 How. 490, 493; Frederickson v. Louisiana, 23 How. 445, 447; United States v. Perkins, 163 U. S. 625, 627; United States v. Fox, 94 U. S. 315, 320-321.

Mr. Robert Newbegin for appellants. No appearance for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrander v. Preece, 296 U.S. 543, 56 S. Ct. 151 (1935).

296 U.S. 543 (Ostrander v. Preece) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexandrine Mager v. Felix Grima
49 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1850)
FREDERICKSON v. State of Louisiana
64 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 1860)
United States v. Fox
94 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1877)
United States v. Perkins
163 U.S. 625 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank
170 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Campbell v. California
200 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Maxwell v. Bugbee
250 U.S. 525 (Supreme Court, 1919)