Ostrander v. Packer

35 Mich. 430, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 34
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Mich. 430 (Ostrander v. Packer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostrander v. Packer, 35 Mich. 430, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 34 (Mich. 1877).

Opinion

Cooley, Ch. J.t

We think the circuit judge was correct in instructing the jury that on the undisputed facts of the case the plaintiff was entitled to recover. He was entitled to exemption for a team, and if the officer claimed that what he had which would answer the designation was of greater value than the *statute exemption, he should have levied on the whole and had it appraised, to give opportunity for the selection the statute provides for. This was not done, the officer erroneously believing no exemption was allowable.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The other justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nolan v. City of Owensboro
75 F.2d 375 (Sixth Circuit, 1935)
McCausey v. Hoek
124 N.W. 570 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Parker v. Canfield
74 N.W. 296 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Boyle v. Walsh
63 N.W. 435 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Mich. 430, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostrander-v-packer-mich-1877.