Ostrander v. Dennis
This text of Ostrander v. Dennis (Ostrander v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 19, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11360 Conference Calendar
DANIEL OSTRANDER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SETH BYRON DENNIS; FRANK POHLMEIER; KEITH PRICE,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:01-CV-367 --------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Daniel Glenn Ostrander, Texas prisoner # 428108, appeals
from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to comply with its briefing order.
Although the district court dismissed Ostrander’s complaint
without prejudice, that dismissal operates as one with prejudice,
because the statute of limitations would bar re-prosecution of
this lawsuit. See Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989);
Flores v. Cameron County, Tex., 92 F.3d 258, 271 (5th Cir. 1996).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-11360 -2-
Ostrander contumaciously failed to comply with the briefing
order, and the district court employed lesser sanctions before
dismissing his complaint. See Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880
(5th Cir. 1996). The district court did not abuse its
discretion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ostrander v. Dennis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostrander-v-dennis-ca5-2003.