Osthaus v. McAndrew
8 A. 436, 5 Sadler 344
Opinion
The evidence of the alleged gift of the note, and of the delivery thereof, was amply sufficient to submit to the jury. This question, as well as those relating to feebleness of mind of the donor, and undue influence on him, were sent to the jury in a clear and correct charge. We see no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osthaus v. McAndrew, 8 A. 436, 5 Sadler 344 (Pa. 1887).
8 A. 436 (Osthaus v. McAndrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lamazon v. Bromschwig
3 Pelt. 274 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1920)
Papernow v. Standard Oil Co. of New York
228 F. 399 (D. Rhode Island, 1915)