Ostfriesland Realty Co. v. Ruberg Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ostfriesland Realty Co. v. Ruberg Realty Co.

248 A.D. 762

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 762 (Ostfriesland Realty Co. v. Ruberg Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ostfriesland Realty Co. v. Ruberg Realty Co., 248 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying appelant’s motion to vacate and set aside a receivership order in so far as it related to one parcel of property under foreclosure and to have the receiver account for the gross rents, affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dolíais costs and disbursements. The rights of the appellant, if any, may not be determined in a summary maimer on a motion in an action to which it is no longer a party. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appelant’s motion to vacate and set aside a receivership order in so far as it related to one parcel of property under foreclosure and to have the receiver account for the gross rents, affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dolíais costs and disbursements. The rights of the appellant, if any, may not be determined in a summary maimer on a motion in an action to which it is no longer a party. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostfriesland-realty-co-v-ruberg-realty-co-nyappdiv-1936.