Ostertag v. Slive
218 A.D. 864
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings, and to strike out separate defense, modified by providing that plaintiffs’, motion to strike out the separate defense of Statute of Frauds be granted. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs to either party. (See Brune v. Vom Lehn, 112 Misc. 342; affd., 196 App. Div. 907.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ostertag v. Slive, 218 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
218 A.D. 864 (Ostertag v. Slive) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brune v. Vom Lehn
196 A.D. 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Brune v. Vom Lehn
112 Misc. 342 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)