Ostertag v. Slive

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ostertag v. Slive

218 A.D. 864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D. 864 (Ostertag v. Slive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ostertag v. Slive, 218 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings, and to strike out separate defense, modified by providing that plaintiffs’, motion to strike out the separate defense of Statute of Frauds be granted. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs to either party. (See Brune v. Vom Lehn, 112 Misc. 342; affd., 196 App. Div. 907.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings, and to strike out separate defense, modified by providing that plaintiffs’, motion to strike out the separate defense of Statute of Frauds be granted. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs to either party. (See Brune v. Vom Lehn, 112 Misc. 342; affd., 196 App. Div. 907.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostertag-v-slive-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack