Ostermoor & Co. v. John A. Schwarz, Inc.

12 F.2d 847, 56 App. D.C. 312, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3394
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1926
DocketNo. 1802
StatusPublished

This text of 12 F.2d 847 (Ostermoor & Co. v. John A. Schwarz, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostermoor & Co. v. John A. Schwarz, Inc., 12 F.2d 847, 56 App. D.C. 312, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3394 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, dismissing the opposition.

We agree with the Patent Office that the picture of a mattress, involved in the marks upon which the opposition is based and in applicant’s mark, is publici juris, and therefore may be incorporated in applicant’s composite mark. See Ostermoor & Co. v. Rose Spring & Mattress Co., 55 App. D. C. 307, 5 F.(2d) 268.

The decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ostermoor & Co. v. Rose Spring & Mattress Co.
5 F.2d 268 (D.C. Circuit, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F.2d 847, 56 App. D.C. 312, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostermoor-co-v-john-a-schwarz-inc-cadc-1926.