Osterman v. State
This text of Osterman v. State (Osterman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BRANDON T. OSTERMAN, § § No. 347, 2020 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1508002375 (K) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: January 7, 2021
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on December 1, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued
a notice, by certified mail, directing the appellant, Brandon T. Osterman, to show cause
why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing
fee or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Postal records show that Osterman
received the notice to show cause before December 11, 2020. A timely response to the
notice to show cause was due on or before December 21, 2020. To date, Osterman has
not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or
responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action is therefore deemed to
be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Osterman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osterman-v-state-del-2021.