Osterman v. Goldstein

City of New York Municipal Court

Osterman v. Goldstein

26 Misc. 847, 55 N.Y.S. 1005

DecidedJanuary 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Misc. 847 (Osterman v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osterman v. Goldstein, 26 Misc. 847, 55 N.Y.S. 1005 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

O’Dwyer, J.

It was error for the learned trial judge over the objection and exception of the defendants, to permit the plaintiff to read from an affidavit of one of the defendants, not offered in evidence.

The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide event.

McCabthy, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered- with costs to appellants to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’Dwyer, J.

It was error for the learned trial judge over the objection and exception of the defendants, to permit the plaintiff to read from an affidavit of one of the defendants, not offered in evidence.

The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide event.

McCabthy, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered- with costs to appellants to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Misc. 847, 55 N.Y.S. 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osterman-v-goldstein-nynyccityct-1899.