Osterink v. Moon
443 So. 2d 388, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25345
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1983·No. No. 82-2209·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osterink v. Moon, 443 So. 2d 388, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25345 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
443 So. 2d 388 (Osterink v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Masters v. Masters
443 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)