Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

415 N.W.2d 20, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 908

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 13, 1987·No. No. C6-87-365·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

COYNE, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

COYNE, J., took no part.

Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 415 N.W.2d 20, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 908 (Mich. 1987).

Pincite

415 N.W.2d 20 (Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.