Osterback v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Osterback v. State

596 So. 2d 1222, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4145, 1992 WL 70147

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1992

DocketNo. 92-54

StatusPublished

This text of 596 So. 2d 1222 (Osterback v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osterback v. State, 596 So. 2d 1222, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4145, 1992 WL 70147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order summarily denying a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The appellant seeks a belated appeal alleging that his trial counsel ineffectively assisted him by failing to bring an appeal despite the appellant’s timely request. We reverse and remand to the trial [1223]*1223court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the appellant made a timely request to his public defender to file a notice of appeal. See State v. Meyer, 430 So.2d 440, 443 (Fla.1983); see also Viqueira v. Roth, 591 So.2d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Turner v. State, 588 So.2d 1042, 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Bridges v. Dugger, 518 So.2d 298, 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order summarily denying a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The appellant seeks a belated appeal alleging that his trial counsel ineffectively assisted him by failing to bring an appeal despite the appellant’s timely request. We reverse and remand to the trial [1223]*1223court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the appellant made a timely request to his public defender to file a notice of appeal. See State v. Meyer, 430 So.2d 440, 443 (Fla.1983); see also Viqueira v. Roth, 591 So.2d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Turner v. State, 588 So.2d 1042, 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Bridges v. Dugger, 518 So.2d 298, 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

596 So. 2d 1222, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4145, 1992 WL 70147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osterback-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack