Oster v. Government of Republic of South Africa

D.C. Circuit

Oster v. Government of Republic of South Africa

298 F. App'x 6

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 2008

DocketNo. 08-7012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 298 F. App'x 6 (Oster v. Government of Republic of South Africa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oster v. Government of Republic of South Africa, 298 F. App'x 6 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. As the plaintiffs did not rely on any apparent authority theories, this case presents no occasion to discuss the extent to which apparent authority can make a sovereign responsible for the actions of a separate entity or an individual.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. As the plaintiffs did not rely on any apparent authority theories, this case presents no occasion to discuss the extent to which apparent authority can make a sovereign responsible for the actions of a separate entity or an individual.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 F. App'x 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oster-v-government-of-republic-of-south-africa-cadc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack