Osteen v. Nichols

Fifth Circuit

Osteen v. Nichols

28 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1928

DocketNo. 5348

StatusPublished

This text of 28 F.2d 1016 (Osteen v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osteen v. Nichols, 28 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558 (5th Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a deeree canceling a conveyance of land to appellant made by a bankrupt a short time before the filing of the voluntary petition under which he was adjudged bankrupt. We are of opinion that the evidence adduced, exclusive of that the admission of which over objection is complained of, was such as to require the conclusion that the attacked deed was invalid as to the bankrupt’s creditors. The court did not err in so adjudging.

The deeree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a deeree canceling a conveyance of land to appellant made by a bankrupt a short time before the filing of the voluntary petition under which he was adjudged bankrupt. We are of opinion that the evidence adduced, exclusive of that the admission of which over objection is complained of, was such as to require the conclusion that the attacked deed was invalid as to the bankrupt’s creditors. The court did not err in so adjudging.

The deeree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 F.2d 1016, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osteen-v-nichols-ca5-1928.