Ostaseski v. Board of Trustees

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ostaseski v. Board of Trustees

111 A.D.2d 239, 489 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 A.D.2d 239 (Ostaseski v. Board of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ostaseski v. Board of Trustees, 111 A.D.2d 239, 489 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring Local Laws, 1983, No. 1 of Incorporated Village of Centre Island invalid, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered October 23, 1983, as amended by order dated December 19, 1983, which, upon the motion of the village defendants for a judgment during trial pursuant to CPLR 4401, declared that the village defendants enacted the law “after due deliberation and investigation to accomplish a lawful legislative purpose and in so doing acted in good faith, reasonably and not arbitrarily or capriciously”.

Judgment, as amended, affirmed, with costs.

The evidence establishes that Special Term correctly determined that there was no basis for the claim that the enactment of the local law was in any respect improper. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring Local Laws, 1983, No. 1 of Incorporated Village of Centre Island invalid, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered October 23, 1983, as amended by order dated December 19, 1983, which, upon the motion of the village defendants for a judgment during trial pursuant to CPLR 4401, declared that the village defendants enacted the law “after due deliberation and investigation to accomplish a lawful legislative purpose and in so doing acted in good faith, reasonably and not arbitrarily or capriciously”.

Judgment, as amended, affirmed, with costs.

The evidence establishes that Special Term correctly determined that there was no basis for the claim that the enactment of the local law was in any respect improper. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 239, 489 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostaseski-v-board-of-trustees-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack