Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank

125 S.E. 523, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1924
Docket15086
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 523 (Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 125 S.E. 523, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Bell, J.

In this action upon a promissory note a verdict was found for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a motion for a new tidal, which the court granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Held: 'Under the ruling of the Supremo Court in answer to a question certified, the evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are embraced in the certified question. See Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 159 Ga. 200 (124 S. E. 883).

Judgment reversed.

Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
124 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 523, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ost-v-merchants-farmers-bank-gactapp-1924.