Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank

125 S.E. 523, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1924·No. 15086·Published

Opinion

Bell, J.

In this action upon a promissory note a verdict was found for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a motion for a new tidal, which the court granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Held: 'Under the ruling of the Supremo Court in answer to a question certified, the evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are embraced in the certified question. See Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 159 Ga. 200 (124 S. E. 883).

Judgment reversed.

Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 125 S.E. 523, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 744 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

125 S.E. 523 (Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
124 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)