Ossie Trader v.

407 F. App'x 609
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2011
Docket11-1026
StatusUnpublished

This text of 407 F. App'x 609 (Ossie Trader v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ossie Trader v., 407 F. App'x 609 (3d Cir. 2011).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ossie Trader has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. He seeks an order directing the District Court to remove the docket entry terminating his motion to dismiss the indictment based on the *610 Speedy Trial Act. We have repeatedly explained to Trader that he waived his speedy trial claim by pleading guilty. See In re: Trader, C.A. No. 09-1522. If Trader continues to file frivolous pleadings or appeals, he will face sanctions. See In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443 (3d Cir.1982).

For the above reasons, we will deny the petition for mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Lonzy Oliver. Appeal of Lonzy Oliver
682 F.2d 443 (Third Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ossie-trader-v-ca3-2011.