Ossenberg v. United States

283 F. 37, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided May 4, 1922·No. No. 2897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

[1] Plaintiff in error here urges that he was wrongfully convicted on the unsupported testimony of an accomplice. A careful examination of the record shows that there was corroboration; but, if there was not, that would not be ground for reversal. Caminetti v. United States, 242 U. S. 470, 495, 37 Sup. Ct. 192, 61 L. Ed. 442, L. R. A. 1917F, 502, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 1168; Richardson v. United States, 181 Fed. 1, 104 C. C. A. 69; Holmgren v. United States, 217 U. S. 509, 30 Sup. Ct. 588, 54 L. Ed. 861, 19 Ann. Cas. 778; Graboyes v. United States, 250 Fed. 793, 163 C. C. A. 125; Reeder v. United States (C. C. A.) 262 Fed. 36; United States v. Heitler (D. C.) 274 Fed. 401.

[2] There was evidence that would support a conviction. The weight of the evidence was for the jury. Applebaum v. United States (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ossenberg v. United States, 283 F. 37, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235 (7th Cir. 1922).

283 F. 37 (Ossenberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Reichert
146 N.E. 386 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)