Ossenberg v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Ossenberg v. United States

283 F. 37, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1922

DocketNo. 2897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 F. 37 (Ossenberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ossenberg v. United States, 283 F. 37, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235 (7th Cir. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

[1] Plaintiff in error here urges that he was wrongfully convicted on the unsupported testimony of an accomplice. A careful examination of the record shows that there was corroboration; but, if there was not, that would not be ground for reversal. Caminetti v. United States, 242 U. S. 470, 495, 37 Sup. Ct. 192, 61 L. Ed. 442, L. R. A. 1917F, 502, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 1168; Richardson v. United States, 181 Fed. 1, 104 C. C. A. 69; Holmgren v. United States, 217 U. S. 509, 30 Sup. Ct. 588, 54 L. Ed. 861, 19 Ann. Cas. 778; Graboyes v. United States, 250 Fed. 793, 163 C. C. A. 125; Reeder v. United States (C. C. A.) 262 Fed. 36; United States v. Heitler (D. C.) 274 Fed. 401.

[2] There was evidence that would support a conviction. The weight of the evidence was for the jury. Applebaum v. United States (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

[1] Plaintiff in error here urges that he was wrongfully convicted on the unsupported testimony of an accomplice. A careful examination of the record shows that there was corroboration; but, if there was not, that would not be ground for reversal. Caminetti v. United States, 242 U. S. 470, 495, 37 Sup. Ct. 192, 61 L. Ed. 442, L. R. A. 1917F, 502, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 1168; Richardson v. United States, 181 Fed. 1, 104 C. C. A. 69; Holmgren v. United States, 217 U. S. 509, 30 Sup. Ct. 588, 54 L. Ed. 861, 19 Ann. Cas. 778; Graboyes v. United States, 250 Fed. 793, 163 C. C. A. 125; Reeder v. United States (C. C. A.) 262 Fed. 36; United States v. Heitler (D. C.) 274 Fed. 401.

[2] There was evidence that would support a conviction. The weight of the evidence was for the jury. Applebaum v. United States (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43.

Judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 F. 37, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ossenberg-v-united-states-ca7-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack