Osram Gmbh v. Schubert
This text of Osram Gmbh v. Schubert (Osram Gmbh v. Schubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
OSRAM GMBH, Appellant
v.
E. FRED SCHUBERT, Appellee ______________________
2015-1620 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013- 00459. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC.
DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M. BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON; JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Osram Gmbh v. Schubert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osram-gmbh-v-schubert-cafc-2016.