Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. Izett
51 A.3d 181, 616 Pa. 545, 2012 WL 3269219, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1781
This text of 51 A.3d 181 (Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. Izett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. Izett, 51 A.3d 181, 616 Pa. 545, 2012 WL 3269219, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1781 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of August 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Whether the trial court erred in holding that [Petitioner’s] conditional and non-negotiable Guaranty, which forms the basis of Osprey’s claims, is an “instrument” under seal (a suit of which is governed by a twenty-year statute of limitations pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 5529), rather than a “contract” under seal(a suit of which would be governed by a four-year statute of limitations pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 5525)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A.3d 181, 616 Pa. 545, 2012 WL 3269219, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osprey-portfolio-llc-v-izett-pa-2012.