Ospina v. IndyMac Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2009
Docket09-1557
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ospina v. IndyMac Bank (Ospina v. IndyMac Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ospina v. IndyMac Bank, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1557

MARIANO OSPINA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

INDYMAC BANK,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

WARREN L. TADLOCK,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00473-GCM; 3:06-bk-31068)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mariano Ospina, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Sheek, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court’s

orders denying as moot his motion for an injunction and denying

his motion to reverse, strike, and vacate and enforce the

statutory stay. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ospina v. IndyMac Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ospina-v-indymac-bank-ca4-2009.