Ospina v. IndyMac Bank
This text of Ospina v. IndyMac Bank (Ospina v. IndyMac Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1557
MARIANO OSPINA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
INDYMAC BANK,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WARREN L. TADLOCK,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00473-GCM; 3:06-bk-31068)
Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mariano Ospina, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Sheek, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court’s
orders denying as moot his motion for an injunction and denying
his motion to reverse, strike, and vacate and enforce the
statutory stay. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ospina v. IndyMac Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ospina-v-indymac-bank-ca4-2009.