Ospina v. Indymac Bank

Fourth Circuit

Ospina v. Indymac Bank

334 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1557·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court's orders denying as moot his motion for an injunction and denying his motion to reverse, strike, and vacate and enforce the statutory stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral ar-gurnent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court's orders denying as moot his motion for an injunction and denying his motion to reverse, strike, and vacate and enforce the statutory stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral ar-gurnent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ospina v. Indymac Bank, 334 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 567 (Ospina v. Indymac Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.