Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank
This text of Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank (Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2336
MARIANO OSPINA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INDY MAC BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00452-GCM)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 2, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mariano Ospina, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint against Indy Mac Bank in which he
attempted to allege fraud and illegal conduct by Indy Mac during
Ospina’s bankruptcy proceedings. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank,
3:08-cv-00452-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ospina-v-indy-mac-bank-ca4-2009.