Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank

Fourth Circuit

Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank

326 F. App'x 144

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2009·No. No. 08-2336·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Indy Mac Bank in which he attempted to allege fraud and illegal conduct by Indy Mac during Ospina’s bankruptcy proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank, 3:08-cv-00452-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[145] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mariano Ospina appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Indy Mac Bank in which he attempted to allege fraud and illegal conduct by Indy Mac during Ospina’s bankruptcy proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank, 3:08-cv-00452-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[145] fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank, 326 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 144 (Ospina v. Indy Mac Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.