Osorio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Osorio v. State

769 So. 2d 429, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 2000 WL 1283814

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 2000

DocketNo. 4D99-1249

StatusPublished

This text of 769 So. 2d 429 (Osorio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osorio v. State, 769 So. 2d 429, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 2000 WL 1283814 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. Any error which may have been occasioned by the court’s failure to include the word “knowingly” when instructing the jury on the elements of appellant’s offense¹ was not presented by a contemporaneous request for such inclusion, nor any objection once the instruction was given. See Lawson v. State, 552 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

POLEN, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. Any error which may have been occasioned by the court’s failure to include the word “knowingly” when instructing the jury on the elements of appellant’s offense¹ was not presented by a contemporaneous request for such inclusion, nor any objection once the instruction was given. See Lawson v. State, 552 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

POLEN, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

769 So. 2d 429, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 2000 WL 1283814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osorio-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack