Osorio v. State
438 So. 2d 935, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24491
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.
We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osorio v. State, 438 So. 2d 935, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24491 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
438 So. 2d 935 (Osorio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Milwood
430 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Login v. State
394 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)