Osorio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Osorio v. State

438 So. 2d 935, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24491

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 4, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1720

StatusPublished

This text of 438 So. 2d 935 (Osorio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osorio v. State, 438 So. 2d 935, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24491 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.

We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.

We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 935, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osorio-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack